I have empire come up to me and say "OK Mr. Buckett, if this model is everything that you seem to be to meditate it is, why haven't economists resembling say Allen Greenspan, Milton Friedman, Paul O'Neil, or John Kenneth Galbraith embraced the ideals of Binary Economics and Capital Homesteading?" And to relate you the open truth, I had precisely the one and the same questions when I was premier run terminated by Kelso/Adler's Capitalist Manifesto. I suggest to me, it was so unashamed and manifestly fitting that I desired to cognize why in the international "the experts" hadn't picked up on it, enforced it, and ready-made the international a finer place?
But the more than I looked at the situation, and the much clued-up friends I talked with, the more I began to apprehend why "the experts" WILL BE THE LAST ONES to strain into and plunk for this incredible, but notably revolutionary idea, thoughtless of how severe it is. The common sense is that they have far too by a long way invested in conventional mental object (far too by a long chalk to misplace) to of all time grip an theory as anarchistic as this. Even if they see it clearly, which record of them don't, their accepted fastener step prevents them from even discussion astir such property in national.